On Friday 10 October 2003 10:24 am, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 11:15:45AM +0000, Angus Leeming wrote: > > So, it knocks 1m20 of the link times for the two executables at the > > expense of 20% greater disk usage. size stats are unchanged. > > What are the RSS values during linking? RSS?
> We can currently link (again) in 256 MB RAM and I'd rather leave it > this way... Sure. I am merely providing you with information. Angus
