Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 12:50:22PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >> Right. And what I am saying then is you this dummy should be avoided >> and explicit call of init should be done instead. > > While this is feasible its removes one of the main advantages of this > scheme: A total decoupling of 'core' and 'modules'. > > This is admittedly not worse than wht we have right now with our > factories, but we will not use the full power of that scheme. > [Well, I think I don't care to much...]
It is pointless to register an InsetXYZ_Handler before any InsetXYZ has been created. At least as far as the dispatch scheme is concerned. So put the init() call in the inset constructor. -- Angus
