"Garst R. Reese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Angus Leeming wrote:
|
>> Sorry, you miss my point. ChangeLog's provide a browsable record of what was
>> done at sometime in the past. If you aren't going to fill them in in a
>> 'useful' manner, then why bother filling them in at all? Ie, that whole
>> 'you must add a ChangeLog entry' philosophy is pointless if you just pay
>> lip service to it.
>>
| Go Angus!
| Good ChangeLogs would be a tremendous help in finding the source of
| regressions. A simple list of files that changed is not much help. WTF
| does "adjust" mean?
adjust because of some of the other changes...
and to find the source of an regression you have to read the patch
anyway...
Changelogs are not for details.
--
Lgb
