Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Actually that is (from what I would guess) a very few situations, and > can just ignore that.
Yes we can, but i find it ugly. > I am pretty sure that just placing the cursor at row->end() - 1 on > "End" will work nicely in 95% of the cases. I agree, although 1) the 5% remaining is ugly 2) it is a hack more than a correct solution 3) I don't think it would be so hard to solve it correctly (is not that I know how, but...). Of course, you can (and would) do as you want. ;-) Alfredo
