On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 03:32:17PM +0100, John Levon wrote: > On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 04:15:10PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > > Ok. I think this is easily fixed by introducing the notion of a > > 'sensitive part' of an inset. I.e. 'insetHit' would only check for the > > 'real' size.... > > I was considering that. But wouldn't it be nicer to simply check > the real width in the relative inset's dispatch methods. If the x,y > doesn't match, do nothing. This should give us the existing behaviour ?
That would be a solution, too. Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson or B. Franklin or both...)
