John Levon wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 04:52:14PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
>
>> I nice implication of this might be that we won't need a BufferList
>> anymore (at least not explicit), but keep only open those buffers that
>> has a BufferView.
>
> Eh, how would that work ?
>
> john
As I read it, I think that Lars is saying we could store a BufferViewList.
Presumably the BufferView would have a
shared_ptr<Buffer> buffer_;
member, so the Buffer is destroyed automatically when the last BufferView
looking at it is destroyed.
In order for lyx to continue to work from the command line, we would need a
NullView frontend I think.
--
Angus
