On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 05:09:27PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > It seems that removing bs support by default is something that has > been done starting with recent rh releases (why?)
<fche> dunno about X updates .. but +bs has never shown a noticeable performance benefit in my experience, and often a correctness loss (it's buggy). :( <TD> backing store and save unders don't really work properly.... <TD> if you get say, a text view, filled with text ie really big and scroll it up and down you can see X memory usage go up and up <-- nasrat has quit (Client Quit) <TD> that's the example owen gave i think regards john -- Khendon's Law: If the same point is made twice by the same person, the thread is over.
