Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | + Branch br; | > | > this too? | | Yes.
Move them into the loop then.
| > | + for (;;) {
| >
| > A bit too C-like to me. I prefere while (true), matter of taste I
| > guess.
|
| I had a while there earlier... a wrong one tho :-)
while (true) {
...
}
| > Why isn't i part of the loop setup?
| > (ah.. i = j)
| > What about it?
|
| That's why. Is there a niftier/clearer way?
I should have said: "What aobut 'it'?"
--
Lgb
