On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 10:43:50AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | Possibly.
>
> but it will not protect us from bad macros...
Indeed.
> | But before I agree on doing so I want 'using namespace lyx;' legalized
> | within LyX .C source. I certainly won't start writing a few dozen 'using
> | lyx::foo; using lyx::bar;' in every file.
> |
> | [The headers will get even uglier when prefixing everything with lyx::, but
> | I guess there's no way out in this case...]
>
> why will the headers be ugly?
>
> namespace lyx {
>
> // stuff as usual
>
> }
Ok. Didn't think of this.
So in fact even the implementation might be wrapped in 'namespace lyx { ...
}'...
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have,
nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson or B. Franklin or both...)
