On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 11:11:15AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 10:44:01AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > | > Sounds like ad-hoc solutions. IMHO this mean that there cannot be a > | > single LFUN_DIALOG_SHOW. > | > | I guess it can. > | > | The LFUN handler simply has to ask the dialog if it wants to be shown in a > | read-only or in a bufferless context. > > That is putting responsibility in the wrong place. We should never ask > the gui for information.
Maybe I am mistaken, but I thought the information was only there to make the gui happy? Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson or B. Franklin or both...)
