On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 10:06:00AM +0000, Angus Leeming wrote: > André, > > how do you forsee IU of the simple things like "button insets" panning out? > Will they take a form similar to that in mathed where the inset itself > derives from MathNestInset and is wrapped in an interface to the outside > world (Formula), or will it be something like the code in insets where the > inset and its interface to the outside are one and the same thing?
The latter. Basically, Inset, InsetBase and MathInset should be the same thing (plan is to move common parts from Inset and MathInset to InsetBase until Inset and MathInset are empty, kill Inset and MathInset and optionally rename InsetBase to Inset) The "glue" InsetFormula should not be needed in the end, so basically it will be merged with MathHullInset to a 'new' InsetFormula. The derivation of (Math)ButtonInset from MathNestInset is just a hack to get a container "for free". I guess a simple string member would have done as well (or even better). Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson or B. Franklin or both...)
