Alfredo Braunstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| So, how do you want insertRow to behave, in _this_ patch?
I want it to behave as I described, but it seems that warrants a bit
too many changes a bit too soon. So I feel my way along...
| > | Note that you have losed
| > | completely the ability to insert at the beginning (this may be the
| > | reason it doesn't work). I don't understand this "half" move.
| >
| > The callers should be fixed...
|
| Well also insertRow in your patch is seriously broken (you cannot even
| insert at the beginning).
mmm... better in the patch I just sent? 1-e
| I dont get the meaning of this patch... you change the interface of
| insertRow but not the callers..., then you say that the change was not
| intended, but that the callers must be fixed? I'm pretty confused.
Me too... I have been looking too much at this code, and making so
many small alterations, that I almost forget what I am looking at.
(And seeing bugs are just our of the question...)
--
Lgb
