Alfredo Braunstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Ok, I've reworked the patch in the Row* version. That's is:
|
| private:
| mutable Row * top_row;
| mutable int top_row_offset_;
| public:
| int top_y() const
| void top_y(int newy);
|
| I've needed to put them mutable because removeRow() is declared constant
| (why?). Now in RemoveRow there is a check if we are removing the top_row_
| and we put top_row_ to the next one if we are.
Can you check a bit more why removeRow() is constant? Perhaps that
should just change.
--
Lgb
