John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 05:53:25PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote: | | > > You are getting rid of BufferStorage, right? I think it is a good idea | > > :) | > | > It is really interesting to see code for the first time the day before it | > gets removed... | | Is this another vote in favour ?
The only problem I have with it is that no access to the buffer
container is not controlled anymore.
--
Lgb
