On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 06:51:18AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Without looking tooclosely I belive the change to be sound, but I am > not quite sure about the use of references. Especially since the > actual obuects in question really are pointers, and that this is not > likely to change.
What do you mean "really are pointers" ? Practically everything in LyX is allocated off the heap - this means everywhere should use pointers ? > IMHO smart pointers would be a better choice, but > of course that does not reap any perforance benefits. I don't understand how or why you'd use a smart pointer to pass a reference to, say, LyXText::transposeChars() > | Note this is a slightly older version, since cvs.lyx.org died YET again > > When it should be up now? It had a slight wobble when I wrote that, and recovered regards john p.s. welcome back ;)
