Alfredo Braunstein wrote: > Angus Leeming wrote: > >> No, I like your way. I just like explanations too. I'll make the change. > > Sorry if I was rude. I have searched this bug for a while. (it keeped > giving me "Timeout::start: already running" while loading images, and I > was convinced that it was LoaderQueue's timer: I have had the splendid > idea of identifying the timer thanks to it's timeout in ms, by printing it > in Timeout.C. Guess what, both use .1 secs! Oh, the fortune)
I didn't find you rude. I found your explanation convincing. Thanks for taking the time to make it so. -- Angus
