On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 04:46:33PM +0000, Angus Leeming wrote: > > > BufferView * cachedbv = view_.get(); > > > if (cachedbv == 0) > > > // do nothing. the parent pointer has been destroyed. > > I see. That's the basic difference to a raw pointer...
Hm. What do you think, is it _really_ needed (i.e. does the BufferView get destroyed behind our back?) or is it just the safety belt? > As with much boost stuff. Clever, but often overkill. (Is Lars a long way > away?) I don't know. I thought he said something with a week or two. So we have to be quick ;-) Anyway, he will be happy that we put some boost stuff into InsetBase. Getting rid of it later will be the real challenge... Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
