On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 11:52:58AM +0000, Angus Leeming wrote: > There is no need for such bitchiness.
I wasn't being bitchy ! > 1. André posted the patch to the list. We were all free to try it out. Mmm. > 2. Do you _really_ think he broke it on purpose. Well, yes, of course - have you tried using it ? I'm sure he was aware that the bib stuff is entirely broken (no key insets, no way to insert a citation), that's why I'm "complaining". > 3. This _is_ head after all. No one promises that it will work all the time. > This is especially true after a long, long feature freeze. If you want a > stable program use 1.3. I know, but this is not an "argh I made a dumb mistake" but "I removed some code too early for no apparent advantage". I'm sure Andre has a good plan and a good reason for doing so, that's why I want to know what it is ... regards john
