On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 08:58:11AM +0000, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 07:01:21PM +0000, Angus Leeming wrote:
> >> This patch enables reLyX to recognise that these should all be output as
> >> insetLatexAccents. LyX can render all except \ss well. Is this a
> >> limitation of insetlatexaccent, or should \ss not be such a beast?
> >
> > I think, \ss simply is not an accent, it is a "real" letter.
> > At least it cannot be combined from other, although historically
> > it is a ligature...
> >
> > Andre'
>
> Yes, I understand this. But then \i{}, \j{}, \l{} and \L{} are all real
> letters too
At least the \l and \L are made up in the TeXbook from an l and some line.
Maybe an accent.
Maybe I should read the code to understand your problem. I certainly see
\ss as proper glyph in my xforms-LyX and I enter it as Compose-s-s and it
is stored as a single char in the .lyx.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
