Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 11:08:30AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | > | Next time please set fixed dates, and if the stuff is not ready, scrap the | > | release plans and let everybody go on. | > | > In this kind of project fixed dates are bad bad bad. | | Ok. So next time I'll keep commiting math stuff as I feel appropriate
Or use a branch... | until you remove my karma. This way I don't feel bad for not fixing broken | stuff So then you can claim that "I know there are broken stuff and I'd be happy to fix it, but I am not able to play nice so my karma was removed. Now I cannot fix the broken stuff." | and you don't need to set fixed dates. To expand a bit. It is impossible for a project like this to set fixed dates a long time in future. Short-term it might be possible. And even for me to say: "1.3.0 goes out the door friday", can be problematic since I have a full-time job doing other things + (belive it or not) a private life. I can aim for friday and not be able to do it before monday f.ex. -- Lgb