Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 11:50:58AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > | let alone some parser framework. Even if it is from boost.
| >
| > I have no idea why we should support stuff like that anyway...
|
| Because it is used in many disguises in regular .tex and it is not too hard
| to get more or less right with what we currently use as a parser.
|
| At least the definition of active characters should be possible.
Regular tex or regular latex?
IMHO if we are going to support this it should be by an external tool
like reLyX.
--
Lgb
