Re: CJK-LyX-1.2.3

[Lars Gullik Bjønnes]

<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

| > It gets rid of Paragraph::wchar_type entirely. Instead, Paragraph::value_type 
| > is defined in terms of lyx::char_type.
| > 
| 
| 
| Defining "lyx::char_type" can be a real life-saver only if this change
| is adopted in the lyx source, Right ?

You can expect that this lyx::char_type will be adopted by LyX.

1.4.0cvs stuff.

-- 
        Lgb