On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 04:13:00PM +0000, John Levon wrote: > On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 11:07:36AM -0500, Anand Rangarajan wrote: > > 2. When I type Control-M a number of times, I get a nested set of math > > environments. Is this the expected behavior?
Judging from the code, yes. What did you expect? > > I do not see this in > > lyx-1.2.3 compiled against xforms-1.0. I've enclosed the lyx file > > (testmath.lyx below) which clearly shows a nested set of environments > > caused by repeated typing of Control-M in the main lyx window. > > Andre probably has some theoretical justification for this... In theory, yes. > > 3. In the math environment, typing \{ in lyx-1.3.0pre1 (qt-3.0.5) seems > > to correspond to typing { in lyx-1.2.3 (xforms-1.0). Conversely, typing > > { in lyx-1.3.0pre1 (qt-3.0.5) seems to correspond to typing \{ in > > lyx-1.2.3 (xforms-1.0). Indeed. I was voted down on that. People argued along the lines '[' produces '[', so '{' should produce '{'. > > My guess is that this is a designed change and that lyx2lyx or some > > other converter should be run prior to switching over. > > No idea Certainly not. This is a purely kayboard input related thing. The stuff is identical in the .lyx. > > I apologize if these are well known issues and have already been > > discussed to death. Also, I apologize for not cross-testing the > > alleged nested math environment behavior against lyx-1.3.0pre1 compiled > > against xforms-1.0. The compilation did not succeed. > > they'll be the same Hopefully. Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)