On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 04:13:00PM +0000, John Levon wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 11:07:36AM -0500, Anand Rangarajan wrote:
> > 2. When I type Control-M a number of times, I get a nested set of math
> > environments. Is this the expected behavior?

Judging from the code, yes. What did you expect?

> > I do not see this in
> > lyx-1.2.3 compiled against xforms-1.0. I've enclosed the lyx file
> > (testmath.lyx below) which clearly shows a nested set of environments
> > caused by repeated typing of Control-M in the main lyx window.
> 
> Andre probably has some theoretical justification for this...

In theory, yes.

> > 3. In the math environment, typing \{ in lyx-1.3.0pre1 (qt-3.0.5) seems
> > to correspond to typing { in lyx-1.2.3 (xforms-1.0). Conversely, typing
> > { in lyx-1.3.0pre1 (qt-3.0.5) seems to correspond to typing \{ in
> > lyx-1.2.3 (xforms-1.0).

Indeed. I was voted down on that. People argued along the lines '['
produces '[', so '{' should produce '{'.

> > My guess is that this is a designed change and that lyx2lyx or some
> > other converter should be run prior to switching over.
> 
> No idea

Certainly not. This is a purely kayboard input related thing. The stuff is
identical in the .lyx.

> > I apologize if these are well known issues and have already been
> > discussed to death. Also, I apologize for not cross-testing the
> > alleged nested math environment behavior against lyx-1.3.0pre1 compiled
> > against xforms-1.0. The compilation did not succeed.
> 
> they'll be the same

Hopefully.

Andre'

-- 
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)

Reply via email to