On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 12:03:49AM +0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Log message:
>       Re-define the catch-all conversion format from XPM to PPM, although
>       personally I'm still of the opinion that people too lazy to define
>       their own get what they deserve ;-)

And what they deserve is a system that works out of the box instead of
one that fails with no indication as to why. So I guess you're just
agreeing with yourself here :)

john

-- 
Khendon's Law: If the same point is made twice by the same person,
the thread is over.

Reply via email to