Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 01:59:45PM +0000, Angus Leeming wrote:
>> This is inconsistent, would't compile on my box and will have Lars jumping up
>> and down crying "don't pass const int". For reasons I've yet to fathom.
>
| And actually I doubt Lars will jump as it adds modern cruft ("const" is not
| even fifteen years old after all...) to the code ;-)
>
const on pod types in signatures have no meaning. so better to leave
them out.
--
Lgb
