On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 08:16:33PM +0000, John Levon wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 08:39:59PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > See attached.
> 
> This is MUCH better. Thanks a lot.

Ok. 

> But, when I quit, it crashed :

There might easily be an "off by one" somewhere. It's not exactly very
robust code... I'll have a look before I commit.

> 
> #5  <signal handler called>
> #6  0x083b40bc in ?? ()
> #7  0x08149570 in __destroy_aux<MathAtom*> (__first=0x83ce9f4, __last=0x83ce9f8) at 
>/old/gcc-3.2/include/c++/3.2/bits/stl_construct.h:125
> #8  0x08149532 in __destroy_aux<MathArray*> (__first=0x83ced68, __last=0x83ced8c) at 
>/old/gcc-3.2/include/c++/3.2/bits/stl_construct.h:143
> #9  0x0814cb09 in ~MathFontInset (this=0x83dc718) at 
>/old/gcc-3.2/include/c++/3.2/bits/stl_construct.h:143
> #10 0x08142336 in ~MathAtom (this=0x0) at math_atom.C:53

Does not look like the classical undo crash...

Andre'

-- 
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)

Reply via email to