Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>>>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
| Lars> Perhaps, but I do not want it. (and your T has to be renamed to
| Lars> strclass)
>
| Lars> and instead of the STRCONV(), you would need a string(). So what
| Lars> did you really gain? (except hiding the ugly conversion)
>
| Why would we need this? I have never seen that we need
| str = string("foo");
| instead of
| str = "foo";
>
| So what's the problem here?
If we agree that implicit conversions is bad, all conversions need to
be tagged with something. (and I am not adding more non-standard
c-tors to lyxstring either.)
--
Lgb
