On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 06:59:11PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> - is technically inappropriate as we don't have static types but pass
> around inset by base class pointers,
Indeed. And every other method I've thought of (virtual traits traits()
const method, inheritance of traits class) don't work in C++ either.
> - does not solve our problem. Instead of 100 functions in the inset base
> class there would be 100 entries in the traits_base default
> implementation.
Can you not see this is a massive readability improvement already ?
john
--
"This is playing, not work, therefore it's not a waste of time."
- Zath
