On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 00:54, John Levon wrote: > On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 05:01:45PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > > Since there was this political decision of including the Qt frontend in > > 1.3.0 if I may remind you. > > So what would a 1.3.0 without Qt's release notes look like ? > > o Fixed some minor stuff > o spellchecking of multi-language docs
o Fixed some annoying stuff o Fixed some stuff that confused Darren Just that last line makes me want the release =) > What are the new features that warrant a release, if not Qt ? Well, Darren's not as confused as he was =) I would personally rather that brand-new users play with 1.3.0 ASAP, or they will instead learn to use 1.2.1 and those lacking in patience (or scared of deadlines) will give up. Or patch the 1.2 tree which I gather would *suck* =) > regards > john Darren
