>>>>> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 12:15:38PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes Andre> wrote: Patch attached. >> A behaviour that would seem reasonable to me when handling those >> WORD lfuns is that they would be like there non-word counterpart >> except that they would do as if the inset were locked. That is, if >> there is a faction right of cursor, lfun_right would go in the >> fraction (if it is not locked) and lfun_wordright would jump over >> it unconditionnally? I think this is a good implementation of the >> word notion and would maybe even make the locking feature useless. >> >> What do you think? I took a look, but the code is a bit too >> complicated for me to change safely. Andre> I could implemnent this. It would basically be something like Or add a forcejump bool to left(). But on the idea, does it sound good? JMarc
