On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 10:10:03AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I'd say that this argument is bull, _you_ know what code mathed
> outputs and if it is AMS or not.
Is \begin{equation} AMS or not?
[It can be both depending on whether AMS is included or not. Making a
choice of including AMS or not on the occurance of \begin{equation} is
impossible.]
> If validate then guesses wrong _you_
> have a bug in _your_ code.
I know that mathed has bugs. This is not the worst, though.
-
Anyway, I am not really interested in discussing this topic for another
week. I fact I am pretty annoyed by it right now and as I know that I could
not resist debating it I'll simply unsubscribe from the list.
So if there is anything _really_ wrong with mathed that urgently needs to
be done before 1.3 is out, make sure to send me a private mail.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
