On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 01:16:02PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 02:19:51PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote: > > Until we have context sensitive bindings, consider this patch: > > This is ok, but it does not really change the concept, does it? > It saves a few keystrokes and takes a few "free" key bindings...
That's precisely what it does, nothing more. And it's consistent with the rest of math.bind. > > It is REALLY REALLY WRONG to "overload" things like ctrl-e to produce > > emph in text and cal in math. > > Sure. But that was not my idea. Perish the thought :-) ... > We are able to use \mathbf by typing \mathbf and \textbf by typing \textbf. > If a user wants to save keystrokes, he can bind that. Yes, but I sort-of understand Dekel's objection. "Ctrl-b for bold" is a Windows meme but a strong one. > Andre' Martin
msg45047/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
