Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wednesday 04 September 2002 6:41 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > | All that is important is that the
| > | authorship is apparent. So our lines
| > | \author Lars Gullik Bjønnes
| > | \author Angus Leeming
| > | are sufficient statements of copyright.
| >
| > Yes, but that information is missing now, so WE do not really know.
|
| Not really. We have cvs. Could you not write a script to interrogate all
| submissions to a file? If more than 10 lines, then you're an author.
You really belive that we have CVS logs back to day one :-)
and 10 lines won't cut it... just think of my "fix ws" frenzies.
| > For the sake of copyright per se, you do not even have to add your
| > name as author to have full legal support for your copyright.
| >
| > | We do have legal gurus out there however. Perhaps they'll chime in.
| >
| > I guess that from a Copyright pow, the problem with "The LyX Team"
| > kindo implies that we have transfered the copyright to that entity.
| > (which is non-existing)
|
| Fair point. So your preferred heading is
|
| /*
| * \file PreviewLoader.C
| * Read the file COPYING
| *
| * \author Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| */
|
| I believe that we decided it'd be a good thing to move the email address to
| the CREDITS file too?
But I won't object to having email also in the author section.
--
Lgb
