On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> Well I'm afraid that user get lost, on the other hand it would be surely > good to have something like this as some sort of default for tabular cells. If you are not talking about the WYSIWYM implementation, I definitely don't understand why leaving the "Horizontal Alignement" section of the "Column Dialog" alive when the columnn width is fixed will induce any psychic trouble ;-) . Or my be am I still missing something ? >>>tabularnewline > Hmmm if Jean-Marc agrees that this redefinition is good (or any LaTeX > expert here on the list) it's ok for me. Not exactly. The redefinition (setting \tabularnewline to \\) is just for latex2html and Co, as they don't use the array package where tabularnewline is defined, and is harmless. What I was suggesting is to use systematically \tabularnewline as the "end of row" marker, as it avoid conflicts with functions redefining \\ (eg \centering and Co), but this will implies either to use the array package or to import the relevant part of this package to the preamble, though is requires either an agreement on the array package or some (may-be-not-so-immediate) work. > Ok could you send us a new patch on an updated 1.3.0? I will have a look > at it again and I hope other people will have also. If I don't see any > grave problems and others agree too we will commit this and fix the WYSIWYM > later on. > > Is that a deal? Why not? Just give me a few time to find how to check-out 1.3.0 (I think I got the HEAD the last time I used CVS). Alain -- ******************************************************************* * Alain Castera * * IPNL - UCB Lyon 1 | e-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] * * Bat. Paul Dirac | or [EMAIL PROTECTED] * * Campus de la Doua | Telephone : (+33) 472448429 * * F69622 Villeurbanne CEDEX | Fax : (+33) 472448004 * *******************************************************************
