On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 12:12:35PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Andre> Ok. Nobody complained for almost three days now and I've used > Andre> it successfully for a whole morning (whoahey..), so I'll just > Andre> commit what I have soon. > > I have a question now that you have done all this work: why do we have > LFUNs corresponding to mouse action, whereas it would seem more > reasonable to have LFUNs corresponding to actions LFUN_SETCURSOR, say, > and bind them to mouse clicks > \bind "Mouse1" "setcursor"
Good question. I don't know. Maybe it's just because we are still not as flexible as we want to be. Currently every inset's reaction is hard-wired. I guess "localized bindings" as in \bind "text:Mouse1" "cursor-set" \bind "math:Mouse1" "cursor-set" \bind "ref:Mouse1" "dialog-open" would be nice to have in the end. Anyway, it would be not much work to change the lfun from LFUN_MOUSE_PRESS to LFUN_SETCURSOR if people think this is more sensible. Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
