John Levon wrote: > On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 06:41:03PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote: > > >>On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 04:03:55PM +0100, John Levon wrote: >> >>>On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 04:52:47PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote: >>> >>> >>>>Shouldn't the format be > 1 ? >>>>However, I don't see why we should store the format # in the inset. >>> >>>I don't see why the output format needs changing. Instead we just >>>deprecate the bits we don't use any more. >> >>Because the format was changed ? > > > That's what I mean - why ? I admit I am too lazy to look at the patch > but I thought Rob was just removing stuff.
Patch to the xforms graphics dialog is coming soon. I'm almost done. John, I patched two Qt files, just to keep Qt compiling here, but the Qt graphics dialog needs an update, that removes the redundant buttons and intput fields. I would like to leave that up to you. Indeed I'm removing stuff and reinterpreting the left-over stuff. Backwards compatibility may be broken in some odd cases. But that Format Id is not in 1.2.x, was it? If am right, there has not been yet a release with the Format Id in the lyx file. So we still can modify the format in 1.3.0cvs, without changing the Format Id number. After the release of 1.3.0, a format change should also imply push up of the Format Id. Good point why it has to be in each graphics inset! Couldn't it be moved to the header of the lyx file, to have this Format Id only once in the lyx file? Regards, Rob.
