On Wednesday 14 August 2002 11:09 am, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 11:57:55AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > > anyhow imho since lyxfunc is stored as a shared_ptr in LyXView it > > should never be stored anywere as a reference. it should rather be > > stored as a shared_ptr or a weak_ptr. > > I think the shared_ptr is just a device to "pimpl" the thing. There > should always be a lyxfunc present, so using references does not look > unreasonable.
Indeed. Especially since its "scoped_ptr<LyXFunc> const lyxfunc_" and so is guaranteed to exist as long as LyXView does. Anyway, André found the bug, which was incorrect order of initialisation. Thanks, André, and apologies for the inconvenience. Angus
