On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 08:06:21PM +0100, John Levon wrote: > Hmm, why is this a step forward ? > > - lv_.getLyXFunc()->dispatch(FuncRequest(LFUN_TABULAR_INSERT, > val)); > + lv_.dispatch(FuncRequest(0, LFUN_TABULAR_INSERT, val)); > > this 0 thing just seems ugly and wrong.
I wanted to make sure I catched all occurence. I think I'll add another constructor that does not need the 0 later... Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
