Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Figure 7 shows the editing experience for the various systems maths > editors -- except it sems for preview-latex. I can't see a cursor in > that screen shot. Shouldn't that show the actual editing experience > with the raw latex maths?
"Detail view" is the phrase, and when the preview is opened for editing, there is not much preview to be seen. > Actually, I'd rather you showed both the preview and the editing > much as is shown for Whizzy-TeX (even though that would almost be > repeating Figure 6). Yes, figure 6 is supposed to show the various states a preview can be in. Figure 7 shows a typical _single_ editing situation. When you use WhizzyTeX, _both_ windows are active at once and are part of the editing situation. With preview-latex, it is either open or closed. One could only ponder whether one would try to make a screen shot with one open and a different closed preview. > The description of TeXmacs and LyX left me thinking LyX was newer > than TeXmacs when the opposite is true. Not really a problem just > an impression. Hm. Where does the impression arise? Actually, I would not even know which of the two was younger. > Otherwise I like it. Actually, it _is_ amazing and nice how many different approaches are already flying around. You get a lot of choice (and in case of Emacs, if you are unsatiable you can use all of the presented tools for it at once). -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
