Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 04:29:40PM +0200, Andre' Poenitz wrote:
>> Actually, I'd even suggest using something like
>>
>> class Action {
>> kb_action lfun;
>> string arg;
>> //double x; (?)
>> //double y; (?)
>> };
>>
>> instead of the current (kb_action, string) pairs that are handed down to
>> the dispatch() functions.
>>
>> This way we do could (a) declare the dispatch() functions without pulling
>> in e.g. the commandtags.h header and we are (b) free to extend that struct
>> with real numbers is they are really needed.
>
| Lars?
boost::tuple
boost::any
Could perhaps be used for a clean interface?
--
Lgb
