>>>>> "R" == R Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
R> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> OK, in case you have not found it yet, the code is in
>> converters.C, method Format::view. I really thought \viewer
>> commands could contain $$ variables, but it seems that the file
>> name is just appended to them.
R> Does it really have to be that complicated? I don't like the idea
R> to introduce a "$$fi", to have a full-path-inputfile only for this
R> particular viewer.
It is just one more line of code, and other viewers may need it.
R> If we decide that the html viewers always get the full path, then
R> why not let converters.C automagically augment $$i with its full
R> path from root ("/")?
It is easy, I agree. My point is that $$i will be a relative name for
converters, but a full name for viewers. This seems inconsistent to me.
R> Or is it impossible for converters.C to find out the actual full
R> path of $$i?
No, that's not a problem. It is just that some viewers may need an
absolute name, and some others may prefer a relative one...
JMarc
