On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 08:27:22AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 12:00:15AM -0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2002-07-11 12:00 -------
> > This appears fixed for 1.2.1cvs but is still broken in 1.3. Andre ?
> 
> 
> As the plain \not is difficult to edit (negative width) and as we support
> things like \notin I am thinking of removing support for \not entirely.
> [No support means, \not shows up as red 'not' in mathed]
> 
> What do people think?

I think that we should keep this feature.

Reply via email to