On Thursday 04 July 2002 8:56 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > That patch get me a bit further. > > It seems that the form_ change in XFormsView was really needed,
Yes, I agree. It /must/ have caused a memory leak. Well spotted. The change of Image::loadableFormats, Image::newImage from a signal0 to a funcion0 also makes a lot of sense. I'm more confused by the need to prefix various things with Image:: or grfx::. Why are those changes needed? Angus
