On Tuesday 18 June 2002 10:57 am, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > >>>>> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Angus> On Friday 14 June 2002 5:39 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > >> For 425, there is a nice script from angus, but I am not sure how > >> 100% safe it is (I have no reason to think it is not, so angus, if > >> you tell me it is safe and will help, I'll apply it). > > Angus> Well, the script is safe enough. It just adds "#include > Angus> file.tmpl" to the end of the appropriate .h file and removes > Angus> "#include file.tmpl" from any .C file. > > Angus> It even shows you a diff before overwriting the changed file so > Angus> that you can check it hasn't done anything monstrous ;-) > > Angus> As to whether it'll help or not: I have no idea. You have a > Angus> broken compiler (gcc 2.95.2?) that dies at link time. Can you > Angus> link if you run this script and rebuild the entire source tree? > Angus> I guess that that is the only true test. > > The problem is that compiling on the dec where I have this thing > installed is not very comfortable from here...
But you have a list of people who have reported problems themselves, no? Why not make a patch and then ask them to compile? Angus
