On Tuesday 04 June 2002 9:27 am, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >>>>> "Osvaldo" == Osvaldo Fornaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Osvaldo> lyx -version said:
>
> Osvaldo> LyX 1.2.0 of Thu, May 23, 2002 Built on May 30 2002, 17:02:11
> Osvaldo> Configuration Host type: i686-pc-linux-gnu Special build
> Osvaldo> flags: included-libsigc C Compiler: gcc C Compiler flags: -O6
> Osvaldo> -mpentiumpro C++ Compiler: g++ (2.95.3) C++ Compiler flags:
> Osvaldo> -O -fno-exceptions Linker flags: Frontend: xforms libXpm
> Osvaldo> version: 4.11 libforms version: 0.88.0 LyX binary dir:
> Osvaldo> /usr/local/bin LyX files dir: /usr/local/share/lyx
>
> Hmm, so you are using the XPM image loader, so this is our code.
>
> Angus, it seems that an angle of -90 shows inverted in lyx window, but
> correct in latex output. Do you have ideas about that?
>
> JMarc
Perhaps latex and I rotate in different senses? Does this cure it...
Angus
in graphics/GraphicsImageXPM.C
void GImageXPM::rotate(GParams const & params)
{
if (image_.empty())
return ;
if (!params.angle)
// No rotation is necessary.
return;
// Ascertain the bounding box of the rotated image
// Rotate about the bottom-left corner
static double const pi = 3.14159265358979323846;
double const angle = double(params.angle) * pi / 180.0;
- double const cos_a = cos(angle);
- double const sin_a = sin(angle);
+ double const cos_a = cos(-angle);
+ double const sin_a = sin(-angle);
