On Wed, 22 May 2002, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Boost signals however delegates creation of functions objects and > binding to two other libs, with sigc++ this is integrated in the > signal/slot code.
Not quite as nice then. > Am I correct in beliving that gtkmm cannot exist without sigc++, and > that if gtkmm is installed then a libsigc++ will also be installed? > (so we won't have to provide sigc++ with lyx as we do now) Now that libsigc++ is more wide spread (ie. when it was included few major distros had a useful version of it) I want to remove it from the dist -- whether we require it for all signals or just for the gtk stuff. Allan. (ARRae)
