John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 02:13:50AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> class XWorkArea {
>> ...
>> };
>>
>> typedef XWorkArea WorkArea;
>
| You want to include toolkit-specific header files in core code - and this is
| supposed to be an improvement ? [1]
And why would you _have_ to do that?
| I will be perfectly happy to dump these problems on you. Btw, I hope you
| are happy with
>
| #undef emit
>
| in core code now, because that is the sort of thing you will have to
| cope with. All for the sake of some spurious wish to get rid of a use
| of scoped_ptr (things which you have introduced left right and centre)
But never for this reason.
(and if I did, that was never the intent)
| regards
| john
>
| [1] insisting that QWorkArea.h does not include any Qt headers is not an
| option, sorry. I have to deal with enough bogosity from Qt (see
| QContentPane class), I'm not going to have /another/ spurious class just
| for this extremely dubious decision
Then work with me a bit, I am asking why a pointer and virtual
functions are needed even when we never have one type of WorkArea in
use. Do not see the need for either, so I need to be convinced.
--
Lgb
