On Thursday 16 May 2002 5:43 pm, John Levon wrote: > On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 05:28:10PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > > That's what I meant. One logical change at a time, then does it work with > > xforms and with Qt? Great, let's make the next logical change. > > But how can we tell it works without compiling and testing ?
Well that's it. I'd like to get each logical change up and running properly. > Anyway, Qt is NOT important right now. I know what generalisations I've > had to make so far, so getting xforms to be happy with those is the > priority. Qt can stay broken until later (though of course it works in > my tree). > > Currently there a re a number of things that are just broken - > minibuffer is commented out, various other things don't work, etc. In the case of the minibuffer, the challenge we should set ourselves first is a clean controller/view split. Incidentally, why didn't you try a combox(FL_COMBOX_INPUT)? I know, like me, you hadn't discovered it til now ;-) Angus
