On Thursday 16 May 2002 6:20 am, Allan Rae wrote: > > I'd like to see what you come up with instead in QPreferences though... > > I don't believe it! You are proposing to work around the abuse of > input() by adding an extra way of handling inputs (what you > euphamistically call "Suspects") while retaining the overuse and abuse > of input(). > > Why not make a cleaner separation of the callbacks the widgets use so > that input() doesn't get called by command/control widgets but only by > input widgets (ones which may be able to have an invalid value). > > That way you separate the code in the BC so you handle like-with-like > instead of a heterogeneous mix like it is now. *And* you no longer > need to pass bogus values to the BC. > > Personally, I think BC changes should not be done in the 1.3cvs > (partly to keep the cycle shorter, partly to work out what hierarchy > reworking is needed and then figure out what/how a BC should work). > But you are writing code and I am writing a thesis so you ultimately > get to choose. > > Allan. (ARRae)
Why don't you read the bloody code before talking a pile of crap? There are no callbacks, only signals. There is no input, only multiple slots. Angus
