Juergen Vigna wrote:
> On 22-Apr-2002 Eran Tromer wrote:
> Now in this special case you don't have a row below the inset so it just
> stays there. But IMO this is the right thing to do, so you just can go
> on editing from that spot on.
Ah. If it happens only this case then ignoring it is fine by me. :-)
As for the more general "what should <Down>" do issue, please consider
making the inset narrower by a few pixels, to give a better visual cue
for the behavior. Won't hurt anyone with a sane number of nesting levels.
A naive question of Bugzilla policy -- if this is an acknowledged by all
as a problematic issue, why mark it WONTFIX as opposed to setting a
far-away milestone or something? Definitely not 1.2.x stuff, but you do
want it addressed *sometime* by *someone*, don't you?
BTW, did you notice how LyX gets horribly slow when you create comments
that are nested 15 levels deep?
>>>I don't agree here to this is not a bug in my opinion and the behaviour
>>>should not be changed, so as simple as that I will close the bug with a
>>>WONTFIX.
>>
>>Uhm? I thought you admitted this one is a bug.
>
> No not really. I didn't admit it is a bug. I only admited that depending
> on who uses it, the one could have different tastes. We obiously could just
> create a dummy row below so when moving down we will go there, but I guess
> this is really not worthwise the time.
<cough>
About this SPECIFIC subissue you said "It should go into the footnote
not ERT though, I agree there."
Regards,
Eran Tromer
